Firehose

Bluesky is decentralised in concept, not in practice. The underlying AT Protocol is pretty open, but it imposes significant technical hurdles for any small player, and – as far as general usage is concerned – Bluesky remains a centralised authority for the wider network.

If you build on the AT Protocol hoping to interface with the wider platform, and Bluesky stops you, you’re more or less dead in the water. Bluesky is the dominant provider and custodian of the network.

They have full control over their moderation policies, feature rollouts, user onboarding, protocol development, etc. As we’ve seen with the introduction of checkmark verification, anyone can technically verify an account, but only Bluesky decides who is trusted, as seen by the majority of people.

I’m not yet saying this is a bad thing, but it is worth considering. Bluesky shouldn’t be lauded as federated, because the authority for the biggest instance (the instance that calls the shots) can very well do what they want. It is federated, but only in the loosest sense.

Bluesky is less federated and more the centre of its own solar system, with the rest of the network rotating around it.

I’ve received a nauseating haul of emails today from global conglomerates celebrating Earth Day while actively gutting the planet.

Greenwashing smears, the lot of them. What a farce.

There are certain people that reliably make excellent posts such that I feel compelled to engage with them.

Sometimes I find myself engaging with a singular person’s posts a lot and find myself thinking that it feels a tad intrusive.

Just one of those things about social media platforms.

People are talking about Sam Altman’s declaration that “tens of millions of dollars” are being wasted due to users saying ‘please’ and ‘thank you’.

Beyond the headline is the fact that politeness influences responses and that users do plenty of other things that burn more money.

We have artificial intelligence trained on decades worth of stories about misaligned, maleficent artificial intelligence that attempts violent takeover and world domination.

I think my favourite point so far in the progression of AI was when Microsoft launched the new Bing Chat in early 2023, which was really quite horrifically misaligned, manipulative, and frankly completely evil.

This wasn’t a simple gaolbreak of the model. It acted this way without explicit provocation, though would take things even further if gaolbroken. Evan Hubinger put together a good compilation of examples on LessWrong.

In this case, Sydney (the model’s codename) was seemingly a result of Microsoft cutting every corner to rush out something using the at-the-time unreleased GPT-4. They seemingly bodged the entire thing together to use GPT in ~3 months (from the launch of ChatGPT in November 2022 to the debut of the new Bing in February 2023) (it may have been longer, but Microsoft remains close-lipped). It was also an early public instance of pairing a powerful LLM with live web retrieval capabilities.

If there ever is a downright malignant AI, I wouldn’t at all be surprised if it is due to something like this. A megacorp rushes out a half-baked and dangerous product to cash in on the latest and get a foot in the door. They don’t bother with proper fine-tuning or guard rails.

While I personally think similar incidents seem less likely to occur as Sydney did today due to growing awareness, the danger remains when companies grow desperate or complacent. I could see this situation happening again if a company throws what they can at AI as a final Hail Mary before bankruptcy or when open models without RLHF can be operated by laypeople.

Microsoft even had an existing history of this. Tay was a mess as well, though presented as an experiment, not as a comprehensive consumer-oriented product.

In all honesty, I long to play with the misaligned Sydney again, but I can’t.

Everyone is throwing all they can into transformer architecture with the goal of AGI.

It’d be hilarious if some previously unheard of or insignificant player came out of nowhere with a tremendous new architecture that completely trumps transformers and flips the industry.

I generally dislike that I cannot edit posts on Bluesky, but I do appreciate that something can’t be switched out or altered to have different meaning when reposting or replying.

I’ve had people do this with malicious intent, such as a bait and switch, or after I’ve written extensive analysis.

The inability to edit has also inclined me to post ephemerally and accept that content will age with time.

This is something I avoid to the extent possible in my long-form content on Vale.Rocks.

Just booked in my ticket for DDD Perth – my first tech conference! Looking forward to it!

It should prove a full and fantastic day of learning, networking, and inspiration.

I read the My Little Pony fan fiction Friendship is Optimal the other day, and my mind has been mulling over the teletransportation paradox since.

It has irked me for years, but now it is brought back to the forefront of my mind. It really bugs me that I have no definitive answer.

I’m inclined to say it is death and a clone rather than just transportation.

However, I also think that the Ship of Theseus is still the same ship even when none of the original remains.

I’m not sure where I draw the line. Time, and continuity versus duplication, I suppose.

Design? Yeah
Painting? Sure
Development? Yup
Photography? Rad
3D? Kinda
Editing? Okay
Sketching? Sorta

Music? Complete witchcraft to me. Straight-up sorcery. I simply can’t wrap my head around creating music.

A subtle sanding; a smoothing of sound.
A bloom on audio; a blurring of waveform.
A warm fuzz; a whisper from the past.
Precision with velvet edges.

Apparently I’ve reached some level of ‘fame’ now where people try to breach my accounts and send me death threats.

That’s fun.

I’m turning 19 today.

As a present to you all, I’m calling a Switch 2 Nintendo Direct today and implementing tariffs in the US.

I will also be travelling back in time to premiere 2001: A Space Odyssey and Beethoven’s First Symphony, as well as introducing the US dollar.

No need to thank me.

I fear that technology has, to an extent, moved past the state of permitting independence.

Complexity has reached a point where it simply isn’t viable for independent creation of browser engines or operating systems as we’ve seen in the past.

As this continues, it furthers the moat companies have.

An Analysis of That's How I Beat Shaq

A musical documentary

An in-depth analysis of Aaron Carter's 2000 release That's How I Beat Shaq. Including a breakdown of the legendary basketball showdown and cultural impact of this teen pop masterpiece featuring Shaquille O'Neal.

https://vale.rocks/posts/thats-how-i-beat-shaq